![]() The court had on September 26 granted interim bail to the co-accused on a personal bond of ₹50,000. Fernandez sought bail, saying there was no need for her custody since the investigation is already complete and the chargesheet has been filed. The probe agency was asked why it hadn't. The ED had named the Bollywood actress in a supplementary chargesheet filed before a special court in connection with the ₹200-crore case against the Mr. This as a Delhi court pulled up the Enforcement directorate for what it called a 'pick-and-choose' policy in the case against actor Jacqueline Fernandez. Her lawyer argued that the actress has cooperated in the investigation but was being harassed by the probe agency. ![]() ![]() Why adopt a pick-and-choose policy,” the court asked the probe agency. “Why haven’t you arrested Jacqueline yet during the investigation despite issuing an LOC ? Other accused are in jail. In response, the ED’s lawyers told the court that she had never cooperated in the investigation and even fled the country once. ![]() Fernandez, reserved the order on the actress’ bail plea for Friday. : A Delhi court on Thursday asked the Enforcement Directorate (ED), which is probing a ₹200-crore money laundering case involving alleged conman Sukesh Chandrashekar, why it has not yet arrested actress Jacqueline Fernandez, a co-accused in the matter, against whom it has issued a lookout circular.Īdditional sessions Judge Shailendra Malik, who had earlier granted interim bail to Ms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |